Author Topic: Ming 'ballista' (1368–1644)  (Read 5155 times)

Offline cheng

  • Playmo Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 3310
Ming 'ballista' (1368–1644)
« on: September 07, 2010, 01:32:05 »
Just an old custom I took out to photograph for PF (They dont call them ballista(s) of course)....
a long time before we see any from PM, if ever  ;D

Offline baden-wurttemberg

  • Firefighter Enthusiast
  • Playmo Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1677
  • Gender: Male
    • http://stores.ebay.com/Baden-Wurttemberg
Re: Ming 'ballista' (1368–1644)
« Reply #1 on: September 07, 2010, 01:34:53 »
Wow they are excellent Cheng! Wonderful customs!  :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:




Baden  :wave:
Take every chance you get in life, because some things only happen once.

Offline Wolf Knight

  • Playmo Guru
  • ******
  • Posts: 11186
  • Gender: Male
Re: Ming 'ballista' (1368–1644)
« Reply #2 on: September 07, 2010, 05:11:33 »
Nice!!! First time I see a helmet fit soe nicely without the visor!!!

Offline playmofire

  • Klicky Firemeister
  • Playmo Guru
  • ******
  • Posts: 10936
  • Gender: Male
    • Copt Hewick Volunteer Fire Brigade - probably the world's smallest fire brigade!
Re: Ming 'ballista' (1368–1644)
« Reply #3 on: September 07, 2010, 06:18:45 »
Great work, cheng, dear friend.   :wow: :wow: :wow:
“Today well-lived makes every yesterday a day of happiness to remember and every tomorrow a vision of hope.”

Offline Gis

  • Playmo Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 2268
  • Gender: Male
  • Polar Bears are cool!
Re: Ming 'ballista' (1368–1644)
« Reply #4 on: September 07, 2010, 11:23:57 »
Great work again cheng!


Offline tanotrooper

  • Playmo Fanatic
  • **
  • Posts: 118
  • Gender: Male
Re: Ming 'ballista' (1368–1644)
« Reply #5 on: September 07, 2010, 11:26:05 »
Very nice soldiers Cheng! The Roman's armour fits them well. (Did you reverse the torsos on some figures? Did you have to modify the head to allow this?)
Si pacem vis, para bellum.

Offline WarriorOfToys

  • Wargaming Fanatic
  • Playmo Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 4547
  • Gender: Male
    • Come check out my Playmobil movies!
Re: Ming 'ballista' (1368–1644)
« Reply #6 on: September 07, 2010, 12:59:59 »
Excellent job Cheng! ;D :wow: :wow: :wow:
My Japanese have no artillery...
Unfortunately, as militarily advanced as Japan was
They had little to no artillery until the 15th century correct? ???

(Which reminds me I still owe you those pictures of Ashigaru Inf. Ill send them right away! :doh: )
Steck is BACK! <:>

Offline cheng

  • Playmo Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 3310
Re: Ming 'ballista' (1368–1644)
« Reply #7 on: September 08, 2010, 01:32:11 »
thanks everyone!!  :love:

....Did you reverse the torsos on some figures? Did you have to modify the head to allow this?...

 :P yes, I plead guilty on both counts  :P I thought alot about commiting the unthinkable before I did it  :P altho irreversible internal damage...my consolation was that externally it was still a reversible reversible custom ;D :P
 

Offline cheng

  • Playmo Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 3310
Re: Ming 'ballista' (1368–1644)
« Reply #8 on: September 08, 2010, 01:39:43 »
My Japanese have no artillery... show us! please show us soon!!

Unfortunately, as militarily advanced as Japan was
They had little to no artillery until the 15th century correct? ??? true...before meiji....even the chinese and koreans used a lot of cannons and other mechanised/explosive projectiles...i hope there's a military historian amongst us to explain this

(Which reminds me I still owe you those pictures of Ashigaru Inf. Ill send them right away! :doh: ) thanks...will take a look after this!

Offline Justindo

  • Playmo Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 2045
  • Gender: Male
Re: Ming 'ballista' (1368–1644)
« Reply #9 on: September 08, 2010, 06:08:21 »
Excellent, Cheng! :)9
:egypt: :roman: :viking: :knight: :arrr: :indian: :cowboy: