Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10

Mystery Figures Series / Re: Figures Series 28 (Boys 71889, Girls 71890)

« Last post by Alex4420 on Today at 13:23:34 »

My apologies, it has been a long time since I posted a reply and forgot how quirky this system is

What is this??? / Set number for this checkered female torso?

« Last post by Danin on Today at 09:09:26 »

Hello there!

I was hoping someone could help me out with identifying this female klicky? And in particular, what klicky or set does this checkered torso belong to?
I have searched the playmodb.org without any success.

Mystery Figures Series / Re: Figures Series 28 (Boys 71889, Girls 71890)

« Last post by GrahamB on Today at 08:52:01 »

Like you, Alex, it seems surprising how often PM uses American 'touches' in its toys, given the poor customer service/ availability in the US.
[I edited you last post to separate the quote from your comment, btw]

News / Re: Playmobil in the News

« Last post by JLMatterer on Today at 01:51:34 »

Mystery Figures Series / Re: Figures Series 28 (Boys 71889, Girls 71890)

« Last post by Alex4420 on July 11, 2025, 19:05:59 »

Quote from: StJohn on July 09, 2025, 01:56:21

The Marching Band Girl's hair doesn't quite fit the chin band

The chin strap isnt supposed to fit -- this is how American marching band members wear them, just below the lower lip/across the chin. I'm more surprised PM made such an obviously American figure, considering their general disdain of our market.

Mystery Figures Series / Re: Figures Series 28 (Boys 71889, Girls 71890)

« Last post by tahra on July 11, 2025, 08:25:34 »

Thank you for the photos

Some really interesting ones.. and some more. meh.

No idea what to call that green jacked woman... maybe slingshot princess, as suggested..

Mystery Figures Series / Re: Figures Series 28 (Boys 71889, Girls 71890)

« Last post by Klickteryx on July 11, 2025, 06:45:14 »

Quote from: StJohn on July 09, 2025, 01:29:14

First: the Highland Warrior.

Hatwear, legs and body print however suggest a more recent historical date than the original Highlander; I'm thinking about the Battle of Culloden or thereabouts. I wonder whether a musket wouldn't have been more suitable than a sword and shield.

Definitely. The Jacobite army ordered a couple of thousand targes to be made but in the end most didn't get used. Muskets were the preferred weapon, a mix of French and British designs depending on where they could source them. Swords are the iconic weapon but most didn't have them. The sword was a basket hilted sword, the pirate cutlass is probably the closest sword, not the big sword featured in this set. Those big swords stopped being used probably in the early 18th century, they weren't around by the time of Culloden. Also the bonnet should be blue, practically all the bonnets in Scotland, lowland and highland, were some shade of blue but I guess you could claim this one was a very dark blue.

After the failed rising in 1715 the British parliament enacted a Disarming Act which saw a lot of traditional weapons taken out of circulation. 30 years later the Jacobites were scraping the bottom of the barrel to find weapons of any kind, the poorer sorts were showing up with rusted blades and various antique firearms with some not even in working order.

Would love to see a tartan version of the grey coat on this figure and a white cross on the bonnet representing the Jacobite cockade. As it stands the figure would make a good represenation of a recruit from the Lowlands equipped with a plaid and targe to show what side they were on.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10