PlaymoFriends
General => Report & Review => Topic started by: Macruran on February 26, 2017, 00:17:35
-
(http://i.imgur.com/em2f75v.jpg)
All I have to say is: Boy II's hair is stupid (Justin Bieber was not Egyptian), and Wife II's dress looks far too shabby, especially compared to Husband II's clothing. It looks like a peasant dress, while the rest of the family looks middle or upper class.
Almost forgot: why do the girls have gold shoes while the wives are barefoot?
-
Dude #2 is a single father with a live-in nanny. ;)
-
:lmao:
A nanny who can't bend at the waist! :D
-
:lmao:
A nanny who can't bend at the waist! :D
So, it was the Ancient Egyptians who first invented the corset!
-
Corset was.
-
Corset was.
:lol:
-
Corset was.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
-
:yippee:
-
Almost forgot: why do the girls have gold shoes while the wives are barefoot?
The biggest disappointment is the boys being barefoot..
And why must most kids with skirts have those stupid gold shoes?
-
Those are all valid remarks, Macruran.
Corset was.
It took me a second, but: :lol:
-
* 729631ade1293d53.gif (7.43 kB, 48x34)
Does that GIF have a soundtrack, something like "badabadum-tish" ?
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oShTJ90fC34
-
Thank You. My loaf is complete.
-
I was racking my brains for a bread pun to reply with but I have failed. :'(
BUT IN OTHER NEWS it seems ancient Egyptian dresses are a hot item in the news these days, what with our little thread here, plus THIS fascinating and very short spot about the World's Oldest Dress. What do you think: shabby/not shabby?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKaxSKHCb2U
-
How neat!
It looks a bit shabby now, but I'm sure the dress was quite lovely when it was made.
-
The males in the second version are wealthier looking while the females are poorer looking.
-
The males in the second version are wealthier looking while the females are poorer looking.
This illustrates the rise of the patriarchy.
-
The males in the second version are wealthier looking while the females are poorer looking.
Not so for the YOUNGER ones. The girls are just as well, and the boys just as shabby.
-
Not so for the YOUNGER ones. The girls are just as well, and the boys just as shabby.
The new boy has styled hair and an expensive dyed shirt, though yes, the lack of shoes and the shorts are the same. The new girl has slightly cropped messy hair and a plainer undyed grey dress whereas the old girl has a pleated dress with more colourful collar.
-
The new boy has styled hair (..)
I HATE that hair. Looks aweful. But I can fix that. The bare feet.. not so much :(
-
You can change kids' hair?
-
You can change kids' hair?
Kids' heads.
-
I HATE that hair. Looks aweful. But I can fix that. The bare feet.. not so much :(
It's useless on an historic child but I guess they want modern children to identify with them. The same for all the short sleeves on their knights.
-
Does that GIF have a soundtrack, something like "badabadum-tish" ?
Thank you, Macruran, for supplying the audio!
Thank You [Macruran]. My loaf is complete.
I was racking my brains for a bread pun to reply with but I have failed. :'( . . .
Any way you slice it, following these bread crumbs is leading me far astray of the topic. So, regarding Macruran's original post, in comparison to the rest of the figures, the second generation adult male Egyptian is definitely more "upper crust." ;D
-
:woohoo:
-
I don't knead to create any more distractions from the actual theme of this topic, Egyptian clothing. But egg-wiped (Eg-y-pt) is one thing you can do with bread!
-
:0
-
:-[
Sorry
-
I don't knead to create any more distractions from the actual theme of this topic, Egyptian clothing. But egg-wiped (Eg-y-pt) is one thing you can do with bread!
A toast for your valiant effort. :cham: